Item 511
At General Synod earlier in the month I had hoped to be called in the debate on the Miscellaneous Provisions Measure (No2) - which all seems very dry but is quite important. Miscellaneous Provisions Measures gather up matters that are important enough to need legislation but not important enough to warrant a Measure on their own.
I wanted to speak about Clause 6 on the appointment of Quinquennial Inspectors. Had I been called this is what I was going to say:
Quinquennial inspections of
churches are of crucial importance. They help churchwardens, PCCs and all those
in the parish who bear the responsibility for care of churches. They also
support archdeacons in our support of the people at the sharp end to whom we
must all be enormously grateful.
All the skills and sympathies
needed don’t necessarily inhere in one person so the appointment is a balance.
And the interested parties may well put the balance in a different place. DAC,
Archdeacon, PCC all have slightly different interests. We all want our
wonderful buildings to work for mission and to be properly looked after. There
are reasons why each party needs some sort of say in the appointment.
And the Inspection is a
different thing in different places. Some archdeacons instruct and pay for the
inspections, which are therefore independent reports to the archdeacon copied
to the parish. In other places the parish instructs and pays. Ensuring
The provisions in Clause 6 of
this Miscellaneous Provisions Measure need to be consulted widely and not
simply rushed through. There are unintended consequences here. The archdeacons
discussing this have found that we have many different perspectives. So I bring
not solutions but a request that something that is more complicated than it
might look is properly discussed.
Comments
Post a Comment